The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Effect of Postmating Isolation Between Molecular Forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae)
Open accessAbstract
Multiple families representing all possible combinations of crosses between the two molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto Giles and their hybrids were set up using forced mating between offspring of wild-collected females. The results showed that the reproductive output of hybrids and their backcrosses was similar to that of the pure forms as measured by egg batch size, hatching rate, and larval development success. No sex ratio distortion was found among the offspring. We concluded that postmating developmental barriers do not contribute to the isolation between the molecular forms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notably no post zygotic isolation was detected in laboratory crosses of offspring of wild females (Diabate et al. 2007).”
From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Diabate et al. 2007
In the citing paper
“Notably, no postmating isolation was detected by laboratory crosses of colonies representing the chromosomal forms (Di Deco et al., 1980; Persiani, 1986) nor in crosses of F1s from naturally collected mothers representing the molecular forms from Burkina Faso (Diabate et al., 2007).”
From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Diabate et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04233.x · Cited by 1,460
“PATTERNS OF SPECIATION INDROSOPHILA” REVISITED
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1997) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02412.x · Cited by 753
Genomic islands of speciation in Anopheles gambiae
Turner, T. L., Hahn, M. W., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030285 · Cited by 734
Patterns of Speciation in Drosophila
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409213 · Cited by 604
“Patterns of speciation in Drosophila” revisited
Coyne, J. A., & Orr, H. A. (1997) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2410984 · Cited by 480
A Polytene Chromosome Analysis of the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex
Coluzzi, M., Sabatini, A., della Torre, A., Di Deco, M. A., & Petrarca, V. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077769 · Cited by 447
Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa
Torre, A. D., Fanello, C., Akogbeto, M., Dossou‐yovo, J., Favia, G., Petrarca, V., & Coluzzi, M. (2001) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x · Cited by 316
Chromosomal inversion intergradation and incipient speciation in Anopheles gambiae
Coluzzi, M., Petrarca, V., & di Deco, M. A. (1985) · Bolletino di zoologia · doi:10.1080/11250008509440343 · Cited by 312
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 296
Favia, G., Lanfrancotti, A., Spanos, L., Sidén‐Kiamos, I., & Louis, C. (2001) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00236.x · Cited by 278
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective
Lehmann, T., & Diabate, A. (2008) · Infection, Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.003 · Cited by 177
“, 1986) nor in ses of F1s from naturally collected mothers representing the ecular forms from Burkina Faso (Diabate et al., 2007).”
Self-citationEvidence for divergent selection between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: role of predation
Diabaté, A., Dabiré, R. K., Heidenberger, K., Crawford, J., Lamp, W. O., Culler, L. E., & Lehmann, T. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-5 · Cited by 136
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Diabaté, A., Dabire, R. K., Millogo, N., & Lehmann, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Centre Muraz (BF)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-64
- ISSN
- 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2178636370
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- UNICEF
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Keywords
- Anopheles gambiae, molecular forms, postmating isolation, hybrid sterility, hybrid inviability, reproductive isolation, egg batch size, hatchability, larval development, sex ratio distortion, forced mating, backcrossing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anopheles, Breeding, Female, Larva, Male, Ovum, Reproduction, Sex Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
